Frame
Secondary research and field guides focused the inquiry on customer relationships in all three sectors.
A multi-country service-design study of how urban micro-entrepreneurs navigate telecom, electricity and government services—and where better customer relationships could begin.
Mobile voice had made connectivity work at scale. The project asked what its customer-service lessons could offer electricity and governance.
Commissioned by LIRNEasia and carried out by CKS with IDRC support, the study examined customer relationships across Colombo, Dhaka, Patna and Delhi. Its focus: urban bottom-of-the-pyramid micro-entrepreneurs, whose livelihoods depend on services that are often difficult to access, understand or challenge.
The team mapped everyday experiences across three sectors, compared good and failed service moments, and translated the evidence into design opportunities.
As a Design Researcher at CKS, I took point on the Colombo leg while contributing across the wider programme—from getting the right people into the room to turning field evidence into a coherent report.
Secondary research and field guides focused the inquiry on customer relationships in all three sectors.
Ethnography at service sites captured interactions, processes, artifacts and breakdowns in context.
One-to-two-hour interviews explored micro-entrepreneurs’ businesses, routines and service experiences.
Community workshops surfaced good and bad experiences and invited participants to redesign artifacts.
Experience maps, use cases and failure cases revealed leverage points for concept development.
Micro-entrepreneurs were interviewed at their places of work. Frontline service providers were interviewed at customer-service sites—grounding the analysis in both user needs and delivery realities.
The same research architecture across Colombo, Dhaka, Patna and Delhi made it possible to see what was local, what repeated, and what one city or sector could teach another.
Instead of stopping at pain points, the analysis linked what people experienced to the structures producing it—then used comparison to find openings for change.
Made process flows, deviations and moments of friction visible across cities and sectors.
Captured successful service patterns and coping mechanisms that could travel to other contexts.
Traced breakdowns to attitude, technology, architecture, process, information and organisation.
Used Hirschman’s framework to distinguish speaking up to improve a service from abandoning or bypassing it.
Asked how working patterns in telecom could inform customer relationships in utilities and government.
The report documented a portfolio of concepts, refined through internal concepting and a collaborative expert workshop. Select examples are shown below; use the sector filters to explore them.
Comparable views of acquisition, complaints, payment, “voice” and “exit” across three sectors.
Micro-entrepreneurs framed as an addressable market with distinct service needs.
Access, information, control, tracking, transparency, infrastructure and policy.
43 documented service concepts spanning telecom, electricity and government services.